| |
16 December 2002
|
| |
News This Issue:
|
- Déjà Vu
- And In Brazil...
- Brash Praises Mendzela
- Season's Greetings
- It Wasn't Me
- A Good Day To Go To The Sauna?
|
|
| |
| |
Déjà
Vu
It’s becoming rather repetitive. Argentina is now onto
its fourth (yes, fourth) central bank governor in the
past twelve months. Newsmakers wondered at the time
of his appointment at the end of June how long Aldo
Pignanelli would last in the job - well the answer is,
21 days longer than the last one! (Mario Blejer, remember?).
Well done him - he managed to grip onto the bucking
bronco that is the Argentine central bank governorship
for no less than five and a half (what must have been
very long) months - a total of 170 days (it is beginning
to seem more appropriate to measure the length of tenure
of the governor of the Argentine central bank in days
rather than months - or years, come to that). Pignanelli
kicked it all in at a summit in Brasilia, not able to
see eye to eye with Lavagna over talks with the IMF
since he took on the job, favouring repayment to international
institutions. The straw that broke the camel’s back
was reportedly Lavagna’s decision not to send Pignanelli
a copy of the final draft of the most recent letter
of intent between Buenos Aires and the IMF.
Let’s see how the next one fares. If he, Alfonso Prat
Gay, can break the six-month barrier, then he’s a better
man than, well, most people. He is certainly young enough
to bring some verve and spirit to the job, at a sprightly
37. That actually makes him one of the youngest governors
on the circuit, pipped to the post by the greenest of
all, Irakli Managadze from Georgia. If Prat Gay can
make friends with the economy minister, Roberto Lavagna,
then he may be in with a chance, as constant run-ins
with the government seem to be a recurrent ailment of
the governorship of Argentina’s central bank - although
he is more of an orthodox liberal economist compared
to Lavagna’s more radical, interventionist approach.
But it is hoped that Prat Gay stands a better chance.
Previously a highly respected currency analyst at JP
Morgan, and Alfredo Atanasof (Argentina's chief government
spokesman) has said of him: “He is a young, independent
man who will strengthen the central bank's independent
role, and has shown that he wants to sustain the level
of foreign reserves and maintain economic stability.”
In fact, he was actually nominated to the post of vice-governor
by the previous economy minister, Domingo Cavallo, who
is now in rather bad odour. He had invited Prat Gay
to join the central bank in mid-2001, although his appointment
was at the time deemed unconstitutional owing to a law
that Cavallo since had amended, to do with the conflict
of interest of his previous job in the private sector
and working for the state. This law will still mean
that he has his hands tied, and if the law is to be
followed strictly, he ought not to be able to participate
in meetings with private creditors or hold talks with
investment banks in competition with JP Morgan, or even
take decisions on the regulation of local banks. It
remains to be seen to what extent this will hinder his
performance.
Another question is how long his term is to last. Cynics
will counter that that should hardly matter, given that
he’ll become legendary if he lasts more than a year.
At the moment he is on a temporary contract, as Pignanelli
was, but opinion is divided as to whether he should
remain so until Duhalde leaves power or whether he should
be given a fixed term, although it would be unlikely
that this would be the full six years that the constitution
allows. It is possible that he may be allowed to complete
the legal term cut short by Pedro Pou’s departure -
that would take him up to September 2004. But all of
this could be purely academic, although let’s hope not.
As one official said of him recently, “He could become
the Arminio Fraga of Argentina.” Good luck.
|
| |
|
| |
And In
Brazil...
Meanwhile, Brazilians and international investors are
breathing again now that it has finally been announced
who is to succeed the revered, soon-to-be-ex-governor
of the central bank in Brazil, Arminio Fraga. A tough
act to follow, but Henrique Meirelles is the one who
finally accepted the job - several candidates are said
to have declined the offer, on grounds of uncertainty
and the rather off-putting judicial inquiries into the
alleged misbehaviour of former central bank governors,
but Meirelles said he was satisfied with the guarantees
he was given. Meirelles seems keen to give it his best
shot, and his appointment has been received extremely
positively by commentators and economists. He is a trained
engineer and economist himself (with letters after his
name from Harvard), and was previously the head of FleetBoston,
so he is of their kind, and seen to hold orthodox views.
He did however resign from his position in August to
run in the elections: he won a seat (which he has now
had to relinquish) for the main right-wing opposition
party, which happily does not seem to have worried left-wing
Lula, Brazil’s president-elect. Meirelles is seen to
have a great capacity to put together a good and cohesive
team; his greatest challenge will be to win back credibility
from international creditors. This should be feasible
as he is already well known by foreign investors. Although
he has a great deal of administrative experience, one
handicap could be his lack of technical expertise, although
some say this is only a small detail as he can draft
in people with such expertise to assist him. So now
all eyes are peeled to see what further appointments
will be made in the central bank. There should be plenty
more changes to come yet.
|
| |
|
| |
Brash
Praises Mendzela
A recent article that appeared in the Financial Times
Observer column picked up on a couple of articles that
were published in the latest edition of Central Banking
journal (which the FT kindly described as “a must-read
bible among the world's half a million central bankers”!)
and were critical of leadership in central banks. It
quoted the editorial which suggested that central banks
should be run more like businesses, as well as an article
by John Mendzela, who was hired by the Reserve Bank
of New Zealand to help improve its efficiency over a
decade ago. Although neither of these articles made
any mention of the Bank of England, the FT piece made
the link with the recent announcement of Mervyn King’s
appointment to become governor of the Bank of England
when Eddie George’s term expires next June, but said
that King was unlikely to be seeking Mendzela’s help
as the Bank had “never heard of a John Mendzela”.
Be that as it may, he did in fact play a central role
in achieving some pretty impressive things at the RBNZ.
Don Brash, the governor of the bank at the time, told
Newsmakers how a new law meant that the RBNZ would have
to cut its budget back to $56.7 million per annum (a
number that Brash says is “indelibly burnt into my memory!”)
for the five years beginning 1990/91, as well as depriving
the bank of its seigniorage income. Although Brash was
“very worried” about this, “John Mendzela scoffed at
my nervousness, and assured me that we could ‘easily’
live within that annual figure for five years. He was
embarrassingly correct - by 1994/95, the fifth of the
five years, we were under-spending the agreed annual
figure by 38 per cent!!” Consequently Brash has a “very
high regard” for Mendzela, and while “no one person
deserves all the credit for the improvement in efficiency
at the RBNZ (we reduced staffing from 550 to 185 during
the 14 years I was Governor, with basically unchanged
functions), John Mendzela was certainly one of those
who made a very useful contribution to that process.”
|
| |
|
| |
Season's
Greetings
Don Brash’s successor, Allan Bollard, has confounded
those who are used to scrutinising monetary policy announcements
for the slightest innuendo when they received an announcement
of a rather different kind from him recently. It came
in the form of a rather innocuous-looking Christmas
card that Bollard designed himself (something he also
used to do at the Treasury - Bollard has joked, “Every
job I've been in I have tried to improve the quality
of the coffee and the Christmas cards”) bearing the
(seasonal?) message, “stability is next to godliness”.
There was also a picture of Goldilocks sitting in between
a bull and a bear eating hot and cold porridge respectively,
as well as a neat little rhyme elaborating on the picture.
Analysts simply didn’t know what to make of it. Was
there a hidden message there, somewhere? What exactly
was Bollard trying to communicate? One commentator suggested,
in all seriousness, that the message could be interpreted
as “a secret desire by the Reserve Bank Governor to
achieve price stability, rather than inflation of 1
to 3 per cent” and consequently an increase in interest
rates could be expected soon. Another was taken by the
inclusion of the word “almost” in the poem (see link),
which clearly indicated a shift in the bank’s until
now neutral stance in monetary policy, and that concerns
for inflation may prompt an interest-rate rise. All
hot air of course. Central bankers will know better
- Bollard was just poking some gentle fun. As Bollard
told Newsmakers, “The card was intended to spread Christmas
cheer and tease those who take monetary policy pronouncements
too seriously.” Click here to see an example of the
card: http://cards.intergen.net.nz/C78F2B0D9BF742288B6FC759635C9F96.htm
|
| |
|
| |
It Wasn't
Me
Hudayberdi Orazow, the fugitive former Turkmen central
bank governor, and one of the crusaders struggling to
rid the benighted country of its crazed tyrannical president,
has alleged that the recent assassination attempt on
President Nyyazow was in fact “a poorly staged pretence”.
He ridiculed the notion that anyone would trouble themselves
to attack the president while in his armoured car: “Everyone
in Turkmenistan knows that Nyyazow's cars are invulnerable.
When I was central bank chairman, we bought two cars
- a Mercedes and a jeep - in Stuttgart specially for
the president. They were already armoured, but they
were sent to the Czech Republic for additional armour
to be fitted. An additional 200,000 dollars was paid
for each car. Even a grenade launcher could not pierce
those cars now.” Orazow also pointed to the fact that
Nyyazow “managed to find culprits and ideological inspirers
30 minutes after he reached the [presidential] palace”
- which he notes casts doubt on the report’s plausibility.
In any case, the aims of Orazow and the rest of the
opposition movement do not include seeing Nyyazow dead.
Orazow was quite emphatic about this, and when pushed
by an interviewer, he ejaculated: “No! No! No! We need
Nyyazow alive. The billions of dollars that have been
stolen from Turkmenistan.... If he dies, who will return
them to us?” Apart from that, the opposition movement
is a touch more enlightened than the president, and
says it refuses to resort to terror tactics. For his
part, Nyyazow has been doing his best to deter further
potential assailants. He has been putting on public
concerts to keep the people happy, during which he has
had performers dragged on stage to condemn the people
behind his “assassination attempt”. They chanted: “O
God, may those who made an attempt on the life of Serdar
(Nyyazow) never see any joy, and may the curse of damnation
hang over their heads forever. May those betrayers be
damned for betrayal and never prosper, and may their
daily meal turn into poison.” Rather them than me.
|
| |
|
| |
A Good
Day To Go To The Sauna?
The besieged chief of Ukraine’s central bank, Volodymyr
Stelmakh, has survived yet another attempt by Parliament
on his governorship, as the session during which it
was intended to have him voted out seemed to descend
into a childish brawl. Parliament had to adjourn five
times on Thursday as the opposition were causing mayhem
by consistently sabotaging the electronic voting system,
overturning computers with gay abandon and pulling as
many plugs out as they could lay their hands on. They
were said to be chanting “Down with Kuchma!” (Ukraine’s
president) and there were slapstick scenes reminiscent
of Monty Python sketches as grown men scrapped and taunted
each other. But behind all the shenanigans and tomfoolery,
the opposition had a serious point: the central bank
will lose its credibility and political independence
if its current governor is replaced. For his part Stelmakh
merely says, “I am not eternal. According to the law,
my term in office expires on 21 January 2005, and I
must resign. That is, if everything goes the way it
should, according to the law.” But he is a pragmatist
at heart. When asked what he would do when Parliament
was supposed to vote him out (he wasn’t to know of course
how things would eventually turn out), he shrugged,
“We'll see when we get to Thursday. And the Thursday
following it, and all the other Thursdays. Thursday
is a clean day, a good day to go to the sauna...” In
fact, it seems like certain members of Parliament could
have done with a nice cold shower.
|
| |
|
| |
How
to Subscribe/Unsubscribe
To Subscribe or Unsubscribe go to http://www.centralbanking.co.uk/list.htm
Or send an e-mail to listserver@centralbanking.co.uk
with the words "SUBSCRIBE NEWSMAKERS" in the body of the text.
To Unsubscribe put "UNSUBSCRIBE NEWSMAKERS" in the body of the text. Alternatively,
send an email to ncourtis@centralbanking.co.uk
with your request. |
Disclaimer
of Warranty
Central Banking Publications
assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in these materials.
THESE MATERIALS ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EITHER
EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES
OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NON-INFRINGEMENT.
Central Banking Publications further does not warrant the accuracy or completeness
of the information, text, graphics,links or other items contained within
these materials. Central Banking Publications shall not be liable for any
special, indirect, incidental, or consequential damages, including without
limitation, lost revenues or lost profits, which may result from the use
of these materials. The information on this server is subject to change
without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of Central
Banking Publications in the future. |
|
|
| |
|
|