Dear Delegate,
Over the next two years financial market authorities, participants
and professional advisers in financial regulation face a combination
of challenges.
- A rapidly changing
marketplace
- Unprecedented pressure
to conform to international minimum standards
- The urgent need
to implement a major new risk-based approach to banking supervision
in the shape of the new Basel Accord
- Increasing demands
to measure and demonstrate their effectiveness
The Financial
Regulators seminar/training course has been designed to
equip financial regulatory professionals from around the world to
understand and adapt to these developments.
MONDAY:
New market structure and actors
Capital markets are changing at unprecedented speed and becoming
increasingly complex and interconnected. Internet-based financial
entities are beginning to undercut established rivals, and key institutions
are merging to form financial conglomerates which span the globe.
This session examines some of the key challenges posed by these
developments. Finally, we examine whether supervisors can develop
early warning systems to help forestall financial instability.
TUESDAY:
Global standards for financial supervisors
Besides changing markets, national supervisors and market participants
face a radically-altered landscape of international regulatory cooperation.
In particular they are now asked to conform to a series of international
minimum standards for financial sector supervision, data reporting,
transparency and others. Some of the key personnel involved discuss
the implications for supervisors.
WEDNESDAY:
The new Basel accord
The Basel Committee has set an ambitious timetable for the implementation
of its complex new accord which requires supervisors around the
world to develop new skills and exercise a host of new and complex
judgments about the way banks manage risk. In particular:
- Assessing risk management
skills of financial institutions
- Setting discretionary
levels of add-on capital charges
- Consolidated supervision
under the new accord
- Use of internal
and external ratings
- Assessing and calibrating
risk models
- Operational risk
modelling
THURSDAY:
Measuring regulatory success
Supervisors are under intense pressure to demonstrate that they
are operating efficiently and proportionately.
- How can supervisors
match outputs to statutory objectives?
- What role can cost-benefit
analysis play?
In all areas,
this seminar is designed to give supervisors and directors of regulatory
affairs and their advisers an opportunity to benchmark
their work against best practice in key areas and to exchange views
with their peers in an informal setting.
The conference
organiser and sponsor, Central Banking Publications Ltd,
is an independent financial publishing house specialising in research
and consultancy into public policy and financial markets. Since
1996 The Financial Regulator Journal (published by Central
Banking Publications) has been at the forefront of reporting
and analysing the developing agenda of international financial regulation.
The Financial
Regulator is backed by a distinguished advisory board whose
members include: Anthony Neoh, former chairman of the Hong
Kong SFC and of the IOSCO technical committee; Edward J. Waitzer,
former chairman of the Ontario Securities Commission; Alan Cameron,
former chairman of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission;
Brian Quinn, former executive director of the Bank of England
and Professor Richard Dale, from the University of Southampton.
Distinguished
panel of experts
Among the distinguished panel of expert presenters at the course
in September will be leading financial supervisors, central bankers,
practitioners and academics:
- Alan Cameron,
former chairman, Australian Securities and Investments Commission
- Alastair Clark,
executive director, Bank of England
- Dr Jon Danielsson,
London School of Economics
- Charles Freeland,
deputy secretary general, Basel Committee
- Richard
Farrant, former managing director of the UK Financial
Services Authority
- Professor Charles
Goodhart, Professor of Economics, London School of Economics
- Kenneth
Lay, Treasurers Department, World Bank
- Brian Quinn,
former head of supervision and surveillance, Bank of England
- Jeremy Quick,
operational risk manager, UK Financial Services Authority
- George Vojta,
former vice-chairman, Bankers Trust
- William Witherell,
director, Financial, Fiscal and Enterprise Affairs, OECD
- Professor Geoffrey
Wood, City University Business School
For more
information about the programme, please read on.
I look forward to welcoming you to Cambridge.
Yours Sincerely,
William
Clarke, CBE, PhD
Chairman, Central Banking Publications Ltd.
MONDAY
10th SEPTEMBER
NEW
MARKET STRUCTURE AND ACTORS
Global
and national financial markets continue to develop at breakneck
pace. Financial market authorities around the world have to run
to keep up. We examine some of the key drivers for change in regional
and national financial markets.
Kenneth
Lay
Treasurers Department, World Bank
Key trends in international capital markets
What will be the dominant trends driving change in the money and
capital markets in the coming years? What are the implications
of the slowdown in the US economy and especially the tech sector?
How will the new Basel capital rules affect the international macroeconomy
over the coming years? This session sets the scene for those which
are to follow by exploring the changing financial landscape in international
capital markets in particular examining likely developments within
(a) OECD countries (b) middle- and high- income emerging markets
(c) low-income countries.
Jeremy
Quick
Operational Risk Manager, UK Financial Services Authority
What e-finance means for supervisors
Despite the bursting of the dot.com bubble, e-finance (the provision
of financial services over the internet) still concerns supervisors,
who face serious challenges regulating banks and brokers trading
online. First, they must understand the new risks and security
problems which institutions can face online. Second, they need to
understand and adapt to the regulatory implications of cross-border
electronic transactions. Here, a member of the Basel Committees
study of the implications of electronic banking describes this initiative
and the UK FSAs approach to online finance.
Glenn
Hoggarth
Financial Stability Wing, Bank of England
What financial conglomeration means for supervisors
Within the last five years, the worlds largest financial institutions
have grown much larger due to mergers between banks and other financial
institutions. The challenges of supervising these large merged
institutions are driving the supervisory agenda in London and New
York. Here we examine what this increase in size means for financial
supervisors both as home and host regulators.
Alastair
Clark
Executive Director, Financial Stability Wing, Bank of England
Monitoring financial stability
TUESDAY
11th SEPTEMBER
GLOBAL STANDARDS FOR FINANCIAL SUPERVISORS
Udaibir
Das
Monetary and Exchange Affairs Department, nternational Monetary
Fund
Standards and codes and the role of the IMF
The IMF is taking the lead role within international financial institutions
in assessing how well member countries implement international financial
standards, through their Financial Sector Assessment Programme and
Reports on the Observance of Standards and Codes. How do the IMF
approach their assessments? How can countries being assessed best
manage the process?
William
Witherell
Director, Financial, Fiscal and Enterprise Affairs, OECD
The OECD and standards
One of the crucial tasks of the standards assessment project is
to ensure that standards are appropriate for the jurisdictions expected
to adopt them.
Marcus
Killick
Partner, KPMG (leader of the review of the overseas territories)
Case study: UK overseas territories
Over the course of the last two years, six of the UKs overseas
territories have been subjected to a rigorous examination of their
financial sector. This case study examines the process from the
point of view of those involved and considers how the relevant authorities
can best react to the results of an assessment. What help is available
in capacity building and planning for the resource implications
of reform?
George
Vojta
former vice-chairman, Bankers Trust
Standards and the private sector
This session takes a practitioners view and argues that standards-based
reform can be of distinct benefit to regulators around the world
by their influence on private sector actors. The speaker also outlines
some of the initiatives underway to provide help with implementation
and training.
George
Vojta, Marcus Killick, Udaibir Das, William Witherell
Round table standards in a world of globalised finance
Professor
Charles Goodhart
Professor of Economics, London School of Economics
Measuring performance in central banking and financial regulation
Charles Goodhart has unrivalled experience as a practising central
banker and a leading scholar of central banking and financial regulation.
He draws on both practical and theoretical experience in this presentation
on measuring performance. How can central banks set and monitor
standards for their own performance whether in the fields of monetary
policy or in supervision? Should they set internal standards distinct
from those set for them, explicitly or implicitly, by parliament
or the public? In short, how do central bankers know when they are
doing a good job and when they are falling short?
WEDNESDAY
12th SEPTEMBER
THE
NEW BASEL ACCORD
Charles
Freeland
Deputy secretary general of the Basel Committee
Implementing Basel II new judgements, new skills, new
staff
The proposed revision to the Basel capital accord will radically
alter banking supervision around the world. This presentation details
the key features of the new accord from the point of view of the
supervisors who will be faced with implementing it. What are the
key new skills demanded of supervisors, and how can they develop
them?
Dr Jon
Danielsson
London School of Economics
Implementing the credit proposals IRB approach and
risk modelling
At the core of the new accord is the proposal that banks capital
changes should be more risk-sensitive and depend more on the way
in which banks themselves assess credit risks. Advanced options
in the accord will involve extensive use of credit and operational
risk models. We examine some of the difficulties which this may
pose.
Colin
Lawrence
Former global head of risk management, Barclays Capital
Key skills pillar 1
The first pillar of the accord sets forth a series of new treatments
for setting capital charges. The intention is that all supervisors
should have adopted this by 2004. This will require central bankers
and supervisors to evaluate and ratify risk management practices,
even as banks themselves upgrade systems. We examine the key stages
in the development of risk management systems, and look at the various
inputs which supervisors will have to supply to calibrate these
models.
John
Tattersall
Head of regulatory practice, PricewaterhouseCoopers
Key skills pillar 2
The second pillar of the accord is supervisory review. Under this
approach supervisors will be expected to raise or reduce capital
charges according to their judgements about how well individual
banks manage risk. For most supervisors this is a clear departure
from a non-discriminatory rule-based approach. How can this capacity
be introduced? How can regulated banks aid the process?
Roundtable
Challenges to Supervisors from Basel II
Chaired by Dr Max Hall
Avinash Persaud
Global Head of Research, State Street Bank
Pillar III
The final pillar of the new accord (disclosure) obliges banks to
provide much more information about their balance sheet and risk.
This raises serious competitive concerns for many banks. What can
supervisors do to encourage effective market discipline and disclosure?
THURSDAY
13th SEPTEMBER
EASURING
REGULATORY SUCCESS
Alan
Cameron
Former chairman, Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Measuring success: matching outputs to objectives
Under pressure to be seen to be tough yet wanting
to avoid heavy-handed regulation, supervisors face a dilemma: they
may be damned if they act and damned if they dont. For this
reason many regulatory authorities are trying to define more clearly
what it is they can deliver, and what they cannot. This session
examines the importance of well-defined regulatory objectives.
Isaac
Alfon
Central Policy Unit, Financial Services Authority
Cost-benefit analysis in rulemaking?
One way for supervisors to demonstrate that they are acting in a
proportionate manner is to perform cost-benefit analyses of proposed
rule-making. More and more this is becoming a statutory requirement
as it is for the UK Financial Services Authority on whose experiences
this session draws.
ROUNDTABLE:
MEASURING REGULATORY SUCCESS
|